Shocking Revelations…Traffic From Paid Reviews
A Background About Paid Reviews: The buzz about paid reviews started ever since sites like ReviewMe, SponsoredReviews and Smorty (to name a few) were launched. Everyone was overjoyed about them…it was literally free money for some, especially the ones who filled their blogs with reviews of bad credit, casino’s etc…It seemed like it would never end – the buzz, the hype, the crazy cash for some! Then Google came along and burst everyone’s bubble, but that’s not what I am going to talk about today, that topic has already been covered, twisted, bent and spun around countless times in the blogosphere.
Getting A Paid Review For Your Blog: A few weeks ago, I decided that SmallFishBigMoney needed some exposure and buzz. I said, why not get a paid review, maybe I can get a few extra RSS subscribers for my blog and build a larger community. So, I got one, I was pretty hyped about the review and I was excited that it would bring greater exposure for the blog. But I discovered what I might call a rude awakening…
Don’t Get One, Unless The Blog Is Huge: I do not encourage anyone to get a paid review for their blogs. The only reason you should want to get a paid review is to make yourself known – because that is all you are going to get. The traffic, the effects, the buzz about paid reviews is all fake, and I have real life examples from two sources to show why that is. Only when a blog like TechCrunch covers you, may you get some worthwhile traffic, visitors and possibly RSS subscribers.
Alvin Phang from Gather Success: A while back, Alvin paid John Chow for a review of his product (Atomic Blogging), Alvin was excited and looking forward to the review…as anyone would be – you have paid this guy $400 USD after all. The day arrived, the review was written and the swarms of traffic…were pretty much non existent. Alvin explains how the review failed to give his product Atomic Blogging any sales whatsoever, read the report here: (PDF)Alvin Phang Analyzes The John Chow Effect…Much To His Dismay
The Report Alvin Wrote Up: The report Alvin wrote up and created is filled with screen-shots about the paid review, Alvin gives detailed statistics about the amount of traffic that came to the Atomic Blogging Site as a result of the review, and how shocking it was. From what Alvin shows in the form of analytical data, John Chow failed to bring in sales and the traffic only amounted to a mere 800 visits. Now I know some of you may think that is good – but a good StumbleUpon submission can rake in triple that if not more…
My Review Experience: A couple of weeks ago (March 2008), I decided to get a review…one thing I cannot fault was the quality of the review – it was top notch and I got a lot of praise in it for the site. But the traffic was unfortunately very minimal indeed, I got only 120 or so visits that day…and I wonder how many of those were from the Mixx, Sphinn and StumbleUpon submissions I did.
Concluding Sentences: Paid reviews are good for exposure and publicity…nothing more, I repeat, nothing more. Trying to get the readership of a blog – to buy a product, subscribe to your RSS feed or do anything more than that is like trying to get a 9 year old kid to eat his vegetables…it just won’t happen! 
Tags: alving-phang, atomicblogging, google, john chow, paid-reviews, smallfishbigmoney
Posted in Online News
Did You Enjoy Reading This Article? If Yes, Subscribe To My RSS Feed!
- Jason Pereira and Fabian Speak Their Minds About Paid Reviews | Diaries Of A Blogger
8 Responses to “Shocking Revelations…Traffic From Paid Reviews”
I think you missed the true point of paid reviews. ANCHOR TEXT LINKS! If you are looking for keyword rankings, paid reviews still provide a powerful source of anchor text links.
You got that right, the best reason is in branding and exposure, and that is really quite important. But then again, it’s true that you should be quite popular already before using that as a promotion angle.
People may not visit your site based on seeing one payed review, but if they see many, and a lot of buzz about your site, then they will be more inclined to visit.
I got a review a while back on CarlOcab.com and the resulting traffic I tracked coming from the site was pretty dismal. I thought it would be better considering the #1 ranking for that site for the term “make money online”.
The moral of the story is to be sure to track every single source of traffic, especially the ones that you pay for.
Thanks for commenting Hock.
I think the problem was that Alvin’s product was not something that John Chow readers would be interested in. Most John Chow readers already know how to do everything that Alvin’s product talks about according to the review.
Was Johns review fair? Well Alvin said that John skipped out on the last few chapters. The book was 82 pages so it seems to me that John Reviewed almost all of the e-book, and I can only assume that the pages John did review were accurate as Alvin made no complaints.
Bottom line, if you are going to pay someone to review your page or product, don’t just look at the numbers which is what it looks like Alvin did. Look at the Reviewers blog, or other work. Get to know the reviewer and thier readers.
As much as creating this type of product is fair, the fact of the matter is that John is more likely to make a review positive if he thinks the product is good for his readers and has a certain amount of value.
Thank you for taking the time to comment, it is always much appreciated. Your comments are very valid and well justified, I also agree with the point that the review purchaser must find out what kind of reviews the reviewer is likely to give and decide whether or not to get a review. Kind Regards and Many thanks, Fabien.